GEDIT FOR WINDOW CODE
when evidences show it saves time at startup (thanks to init scripts started in a parallel way), when code is shared among several small binaries (the advantage of an umbrella project), etc. "It is bloated and just wastes and wastes and wastes".
Just read in this thread the "arguments" against systemd and you will basically only see rants based on nothing concrete: Gnu Linux" becoming the laughing stock of Windows fans It is like a religious mission trying to force it upon everybody.Īnd systemd require rebooting unless the component being upgraded is the kernel I want to keep my system as simple as possible The sysvinit that comes with Linux is simple enough, well-understood enough, and stress-tested enough that you really don’t want to mess with it to get For production systems you really want to leave well enough alone and One major reason for this is that a small program has fewer places for bugs to hide than a big program does.Īnd another Unix system design principle is, if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. You often hear the phrase “do one thing, and do it well” as a guiding principleįor writing a Unix program.
In Unix system design, it is a generally understood principle that a big task not be handled by a big program, but rather a collection of small programs,Įach tackling one specific, well-defined component of the larger task.
0 kommentar(er)
